The Science of Self-Trust, and Why It Comes Before Trusting Anyone Else
You cannot accurately read whether someone else deserves your trust if you do not trust your own judgment in the first place. What psychological research on attachment, self-efficacy and interoception reveals about self-trust, and why it is the foundation for trusting other people.

Photo: Alena Darmel / Pexels
Trust is usually described as something that happens between two people. The research tells a different story. Long before you can accurately judge whether someone else deserves your trust, you need a working relationship with your own judgment, and that relationship turns out to be considerably more foundational, and considerably more fragile, than most people assume.
Trust starts as a stage of development, not a decision
Psychologist Erik Erikson identified trust versus mistrust as the very first psychosocial stage of human development, unfolding in the first year of life, well before language or reasoning arrive to help. An infant whose needs are met consistently develops a basic sense that the world, and by extension itself, can be relied upon. One whose needs are met unpredictably develops the opposite. This is not simply about learning to trust caregivers. It becomes the earliest template for whether you expect your own signals, hunger, discomfort, distress, to actually get a reliable response, which is the first draft of self-trust before you have any concept of the word.
This article is for members only
Become a member to unlock this article and all premium content.
Related Articles

Rich Monday Paper London Edition 121: Whose Voices Are Heard Where Decisions Are Made?

China Is Teaching Six Year Olds to Speak AI

Monday Mindset: Why Mondays Feel Hard and How to Reset

